Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Surface Coal Mining Prohibition (Lake Macquarie) Bill 2009
It is my understanding that a Cabinet decision on whether to support such a Bill is based largely if not solely on the recommendation of the relevant Minister. The Minister indicated from the start of the meeting that she had decided not to support the Bill.
Her reasons included the view that the existing provisions for Lake Macquarie contained within SEPP (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007, are sufficient to ensure that open cut, including the recent auger mining proposal, remain a prohibition with Lake Macquarie.
The Minister referred to advice from legal counsel on which they have based this view. Even more surprisingly, she indicated to me that this advice - or part thereof - was the reason Centennial Coal withdrew its proposal for the Olstan project. This is completely at odds with the reasons stated by Centennial and raises questions as to why any decisive opinion was not released or even referred to by the Government at that time.
Local residents and myself had been waiting for the release of advice from Counsel and many were disappointed when we were told that the seeking of advice was discontinued when the project was withdrawn. Something just doesn’t add up with that view, however the Minister responded to my question by saying that she would find out why the advice wasn’t referred to. In the meantime, I have lodged an FOI application with the Department of Planning for information relating to any legal or technical advice it may have received regarding the permissibility of the project.
The Minister also said that the DoP had concerns that provisions of my Bill may have unforeseen impacts on underground mining operations by inadvertently prohibiting associated surface works such as buildings, drifts and other infrastructure. I do not believe that there is any likelihood that such an interpretation could be made of the Bill and can only see both purported reasons as an attempt to justify what seems to be a political decision to not support a Private Member’s Bill, particularly a Private Member who holds a notional Labor seat!
Advancing the Bill at this stage would see it “killed” by the Government, so I will be postponing debate on the Bill until next year and use the ensuing time to meet with local residents, particularly the executives of BAM, SCAM and NOCMFA to discuss where to from here.
The Bill is inherently sensible and supports and improves on State policy. It is about ensuring that no clever use of definitions can bring about another proposal for an open cut mine or anything that looks or smells like an open cut mine. I remain supportive of the coal mining industry in Lake Macquarie where coal is retrieved using traditional underground methods. This Bill should be passed.
Friday, July 17, 2009
Olstan Auger Mine abandoned!
Friday July 17, 2009
PROPOSED OLSTAN PROJECT
Centennial Coal has announced its decision to withdraw the project application for the proposed
Olstan Auger project following its review of the latest technical studies.
“Centennial and its consultants have been conducting technical studies to ensure that the
project would comply with both the statutory environmental standards and our own company
standards”, said Katie Brassil, Centennial Coal’s Group Manager External Affairs.
“As studies have progressed there have been a number of concessions to the mine design in
order to address potentially unacceptable impacts on the environment and community. These
changes have increased both capital and operating costs and the project is no longer viable”, Ms
Brassil continued.
In April this year, Centennial lodged a Project Application including a Preliminary Environmental
Assessment (PEA) with the Department of Planning for the proposed Olstan Auger Project.
Olstan was to be a small-scale auger-mining project recovering less than 1.5mtpa of remnant
coal over 3 years.
Centennial has consistently highlighted that the onus is on the company, as project proponent,
to demonstrate, using scientifically based evidence and fact, both the benefits and impacts a
proposal may have for the local community.
Therefore, Centennial has been progressively working on the range of technical studies required
to compile the final comprehensive Environmental Assessment for the project. The assessment
process also requires concurrent community consultation while finalising the technical studies to
ensure informed and balanced decision making on the project.
“Centennial has followed the government’s rules and processes, and while the proposed project
has garnered opposition, Centennial has remained focussed on the planning and assessment
process and the facts, and this is the basis for our decision to withdraw the project application”,
Ms Brassil explained.
Olstan was intended to supply coal to fill current contracts with the local power stations.
Therefore, other options will now be investigated to address any potential shortfall. These
options may include increasing production at an existing operation or sourcing coal from another
location.
Centennial’s long-term future in the Lake Macquarie area remains with our existing operations
and the Awaba East and Mandalong South underground projects.